For many years, now, females have actually been losing tasks after bold to reveal the view that biology is genuine and crucial.

Companies and public bodies, recorded by the demands of extremist trans activists, have exacted terrible punishments on those expressing perfectly mainstream - and legal - views on sex and gender.

Inevitably, tribunals have actually followed a variety of these cases. During these, we have actually heard horrifying information of females treated abominably by companies in thrall to advocates who advised and enforced the illegal adoption of self-ID policies when it concerned single-sex areas.

We've become aware of ladies bullied and shunned for questioning the right of those born male to self-identify into ladies's areas, from altering spaces to domestic violence refuges.

Equally undoubtedly, those females efficient in fighting back have been winning legal actions.

But even a rock solid case does not make it simple to retaliate. Good lawyers are pricey and the process is draining, both physically and mentally.

For each female who has thrived in court, there are a lot more for whom launching a legal case seemed impossible.

The establishment by the novelist and philanthropist JK Rowling of a fund to support women's legal defense of their rights right away removes any monetary barriers to action for those with practical cases.

Author JK Rowling has developed a fund to support women's legal protection of their rights

The intervention of Ms Rowling should, right now, be concentrating minds in human resources departments across the nation.

Since the Supreme Court ruled, last month, that sex, in law, referred biology instead of documents, a number of organisations - in both the general public and economic sectors - have actually provided declarations announcing their choices to "think about" the ramifications for their policies.

This extensive and careless complacency stands to cost companies - and taxpayer-funded bodies - dear. The truths are basic. If a service is offered on a single sex basis that means biological sex, not individuality.

The law is the law and no further factor to consider is required in order for companies to satisfy their commitments under it.

A number of past legal actions after ladies were unjustly dismissed or bullied out of tasks for declining to agree with the mantra "trans women are women" were possible thanks to the support of online crowd-funding projects. Ms Rowling often promoted - and contributed to - such fundraising events.

Now, she's a one-woman crowd-funder, ready to back the cases of every woman wronged at work for speaking the reality about sex.

The JK Rowling Women's Fund will transform the battleground when it comes to versus for their legitimate, reality-based views.

At the heart of industrial tribunals there may be susceptible individuals playing for high stakes but the human cost means absolutely nothing to the insurance companies financing companies' expenses. For them, it's all about the bottom line and the possibility that every female with a case now has access to the very best lawyers in the service will, I believe, motivate lots of to urge settlement instead of the embarrassment, and inescapable expense, of more doomed defences.

If one needed proof that females's rights require the fiercest defense, it can be found in the action to the launch of Ms Rowling's fund.

With scrumptious pathos, one activist lawyer stated online that the Harry Potter developer had "emerged from the shadows" as the funder of what he explained as the "anti feminist biology is fate motion".

Ms Rowling has never remained in the shadows when it concerns her views on women's rights, has she?

Other responses were, naturally, more violent in tone.

The ongoing tribunal including nurse Sandie Peggie, declaring discrimination and harassment against NHS Fife and trans-identifying doctor Beth Upton, brought the issue of the method so called "gender important" women had actually been treated at work to wide attention. This is a case that "cut through" with the public and forced some politicians to deal with a problem they chose to avoid.

Scottish Labour's leader Anas Sarwar and his deputy, Jackie Baillie, revealed their support for Ms Peggie and stated their belief in the value of biological sex.

If they 'd understood what they understand now, they added, they would not have voted in favour of the SNP's ultimately doomed strategy to permit anybody to self-identify into the legally-recognised sex of their picking.

But while the Peggie case and the subsequent judgment on the legal significance of sex by the Supreme Court might have forced an embarrassing U-turn by the Labour leadership on the matter of biological reality, others remain stubbornly committed to defiance of the law.

Naturally, the Scottish Greens - a fantastic Wodehousian satire of an innovative cell - remain dedicated to making use of single-sex areas by anyone who feels they come from that sex.

There have actually been recent declarations of resistance from trade unions, too. Unison has actually allowed a trans lady to run for a women-only position on its nationwide executive council.

But every act of performative defiance by well-funded trade unions - or taxpayer-funded regional authorities and health boards - is another pricey legal action in the making.

It ought to not have been necessary for JK Rowling to guarantee to finance the legal expenses of ladies discriminated against for their views on sex and gender. Nobody should ever have lost a task, a promo, or a contract on the basis of their view that sex is immutable and essential.

Nor must the novelist have felt it essential to develop, in 2022, Beira's Place, a women-only assistance service for victims of sexual violence in the Lothian area.

Ms Rowling's decisions to fund Beira's Place and to finance the legal costs of females discriminated against for believing in the reality of sex are acts of feminist philanthropy which, in a world not made batty by gender ideology, would have been hailed by our politicians.

I understand that recognition is the last thing on the writer's mind but isn't it downright weird that, when he broaches the achievements of effective Scots, First Minister John Swinney never points out the assistance Beira's Place has offered to hundreds of ladies?

Money is not the only thing females taking action to defend their rights require. Ask anybody who has been through the tribunal procedure and they'll inform you that the emotional support of good friends and allies is essential.

This comfort will not remain in brief supply for those ladies who receive backing for their cases from the JK Rowling Women's Fund. The author is part of an international network of campaigners, combating to protect women's rights against the demands of trans activists, and calls to action and support do not go unheeded.

Let the country's personnels departments brace themselves. A most exceptional plot twist has actually simply been composed.